Here are two posts worth reading.
One is about the outperformance of “glamor” over “value” stocks these last few years. I’ve felt this. On a relative basis, the last couple years have been the hardest time ever for me to pick stocks.
The other post is about Sanborn Map. It’s a classic Buffett investment. And the post does a good job of breaking down the logical arguments that were probably running through Buffett’s head.
A few people have emailed me asking for my thoughts about Armanino Foods of Distinction (AMNF). I don’t have any right now. But Whopper Investments does:
I think Armanino is undervalued at today’s prices. It’s growing pretty fast and creating tons of value from that growth, so that value gap should (hopefully) grow over time. And, as an added kicker, there’s the potential for a merger at a huge premium, which would be easily supported by the synergy potential, and/or a big special dividend to lever the company up.
I lied. I do have one thought. At one point, Whopper says:
I tend to think that their frozen products fall more into the “commodity” segment than the “branded” segment, but their returns on capital actually suggest other wise. Pre-tax returns on capital are well over 50% and gross margins are in the 35% range. Those tend returns tend to indicate some form of brand strength or competitive advantage.
That’s true. However, it is imperative that when you find empirical evidence of a competitive advantage you back it up with a rational explanation for that competitive advantage.
You always want to combine abstract reason with concrete evidence to prove something’s practical existence.
If you fail to do this, you will end up taking the magic formula approach. Many companies earn excess returns. Some have durable moats. Others do not. It may work out on average to simply assume moats based on high returns on capital. In fact, the historical data Greenblatt used says that the approach did work in the past.
But you must never beg the question. You must never argue that this company has a moat because only a company with a moat could earn the returns this company is now earning.
Instead we must look for both a rational theory and empirical data that are reasonable when considered separately and agree when put together.
Articles
Where Does a Stock’s Future Return Come From?
Should Buy and Hold Investors Worry about EV/EBITDA?
How Today’s Debt Lowers Tomorrow’s Returns
Why I’m Pessimistic about Stocks
Read more
A blog I read, valueprax, reviewed How to Read a Book. I had never read the book before. So I thought I would give it a try. It is – of course – mostly about reading books. And while investors read a lot (in fact, that’s most of what they do) it rarely comes in book form.
Still, a lot of what you’ll find in How to Read a Book can help with reading 10-Ks, S-1s, investor presentations, earnings call transcripts, annual letters, newspaper articles, trade journals, etc.
I think this quote sums up the problem new investors have:
Most of us are addicted to non-active reading. The outstanding fault of the non-active or undemanding reader is his inattention to words, and his consequent failure to come to terms with the author.
SEC reports are not known for being communicative. But in most cases where someone emails me asking about a part of a 10-K they do not understand – the answer can be found in the same 10-K. You just have to read the footnotes, understand how the income statement and cash flow statement and balance sheet relate, and know whether the company is using GAAP or IFRS. With the internet, you don’t even need to know all the actual norms of GAAP and IFRS – since you can always just google “IFRS biological assets” if you’re confused.
This sounds like a lot to keep straight. But if you come to every 10-K armed with a pen, a pad of paper, a highlighter, and a calculator – it’s so much easier. When I see something out of the ordinary I just scrawl “Depreciating too fast?”, “Why did marketing expense double?”, “When was building bought?”, etc. right in the margin.
It is easy to miss the relevance of depreciation method, useful life, residual value, etc. in a depreciation footnote if you read it the way you would read a newspaper article, novel, etc. Most people read most things passively.
Read the 10-K actively.
A depreciation footnote takes on a whole new meaning when you are looking through the 10-K specifically making calculations based on questions you came up with yourself about depreciation. You now read it in the context that matters to you.
Here’s one other great piece of advice from How to Read a Book. Just read the whole thing straight through first. It’s amazing how few people read a 10-K twice. If you’ve ever seen a movie straight through twice – within the same week or so – you’ll realize you missed a lot the first time through. Popular movies are not made to be dense or difficult to understand. But I don’t think there’s anyone who can see even a very superficial seeming movie twice in the same week and not find something in the rewatch they missed the first time through.
Why?
Context. The best context in which to analyze something is to already be familiar with it. The first time …
Read moreI recently mentioned something in an email that I’m not sure I’ve said before on this blog. I always read the newest and oldest 10-K for a company when I start analyzing it. Reading the oldest 10-K gives you perspective.
This little habit will make you a better investor.
EDGAR has 10-Ks going back to the mid 1990s. So, you’ll have the experience of reading a 2012 annual report and something like a 1996 annual report.
This always gives me added perspective on the business. And it gets my thinking about how the business has changed over time and how it will change in the future.…
Read moreThe man who turned around GEICO died:
John Byrne, Geico CEO Buffett Cited for ‘Brilliance,’ Dies at 80…
Read moreI only own two American stocks. Both are micro caps. They are George Risk (RSKIA) and Ark Restaurants (ARKR). Both stocks came out with news recently.
Ken Risk, the CEO and majority (58%) owner of George Risk, died. His daughter, already the CFO, was made President and Chairman. His widow was also added to the board. The company’s record under Ken Risk was extraordinary. His death is a big negative for shareholders.
Ark Restaurants rejected a $22 a share buyout offer from Landry’s. Then Landry’s sent out a press release questioning the motives of Ark’s board.
Here are the latest press releases in each story:
Read moreMarket Folly links to an interview Mohnish Pabrai gave to The Motely Fool. In that interview, Pabrai mentions 3 places Charlie Munger said you should look for stocks. Munger said to look for stocks that:
For #1 you can read the Market Folly blog, go to GuruFocus, or subscribe to the Hedge Fund Wisdom Newsletter.
For #2 you can read Value Line, go to GuruFocus, or go to Morningstar.
And for #3 you can go someplace like StockSpinoffs.com.…
Read moreI mentioned John Malone recently because I just watched an interview he did. Then I noticed Whopper Investments recommended Cable Cowboy which is a book about John Malone and TCI. And now, I see from Asif Suria’s “Insider Weekends” that on December 18th John Malone bought $56 million of Liberty Media (LMCA) stock.…
Read moreMr. Market blog links to an excellent John Malone interview. It is definitely worth watching the whole thing. By the way, if you don’t know anything about John Malone the book Cable Cowboy is a good place to start.
Read moreNate over at Oddball Stocks put up a list of 13 stocks for 2013. This is a good list of obscure stocks from around the world. They are all worth looking into.
Read more© 2024 All Rights Reserved.